Zooming in to see the trees
The Flexera 2023 State of the Cloud Report reveals that less than 25% of the organizations surveyed have accurate visibility into their IT estates.
Why?
Because they don’t have comprehensive and accurate data on the assets in the IT estate. Without complete and detailed data, they can’t get an accurate view of the “trees.”
There are many sources of IT asset data, such as discovery tools, endpoint management tools, SaaS vendors, and cloud providers. The problem is that pooling data from multiple sources often creates a fragmented view of the IT estate.
In addition, a source may report multiple instances of the same asset because different product names are used for that asset, or more than one source may report the same asset. This duplicate data causes “double vision.”
Moreover, the data may need more detail. For example, the software data may not include end-of-life (EOL) or end-of-service (EOS) dates necessary for determining sustainability. Or it may lack security vulnerability data, exposing the company to risk. Hardware data may be missing power consumption or cooling requirements, hindering efforts to calculate operating costs accurately.
Most IT organizations (71%, according to the Flexera 2022 State of ITAM Report) approach the problem by consolidating asset data in a configuration management database (CMDB).
Unfortunately, most of these organizations report that they don’t receive meaningful value from their CMDB investments. That’s usually because the CMDB data isn’t complete and accurate. The reality is, aggregating and maintaining accurate data in the CMDB is challenging, especially if you’re using manual processes.
It would help if you could aggregate, clean, normalize, and enrich data gathered from traditional sources to create a reliable, detailed single source of truth about your IT estate.